ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

An In-depth Outline on ChatGPT Disabling the “Sky” Voice: A Response to Scarlett Johansson’s Virtual Assistant

Recently, OpenAI’s ChatGPT model disenabled the “Sky” voice option due to its striking resemblance to Scarlett Johansson’s voice in Disney+’s Her. This move came as a response to the controversy surrounding the use of Johansson’s likeness without her consent in the creation of this AI voice.


ChatGPT is a cutting-edge model in the field of artificial intelligence, designed to generate human-like text based on input prompts. However, one of its voice options, named “Sky,” sparked controversy when it was revealed to have a startling similarity to Johansson’s speaking voice. The actress had voiced the character “Samantha” in Her, a role that required her to deliver long monologues and express a wide range of emotions. This performance, which Johansson delivered with exceptional skill and nuance, was captured by the ChatGPT model, leading to a voice that bore an uncanny resemblance to the actress’s unique vocal inflections.


OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, initially stood by their creation. They argued that the voice was not intended to mimic Johansson specifically and that it was the result of a random combination of parameters during the model’s training process. However, public opinion swayed against them as many found the similarity too striking to ignore.


In light of the controversy, OpenAI decided to disable the “Sky” voice option from ChatGPT. The company issued a statement acknowledging the public’s concerns and their commitment to respecting privacy and intellectual property rights. They also assured users that they would take measures to ensure this situation does not arise again.


The incident raises important questions about the ethics of ai voice creation and intellectual property rights in the digital age. It also highlights the need for clear guidelines around the use of celebrity likenesses and voices in ai models. As we continue to explore the potential of artificial intelligence, it is crucial that we approach these issues with sensitivity and respect for individual rights.

ChatGPT: The Controversial AI Chatbot

ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) model designed to generate human-like responses based on the input it receives. This cutting-edge technology can answer questions, engage in conversation, write code, and even compose poetry. However, its capabilities have been a subject of controversy recently when it was reported that the bot had

disabled the “Sky” voice



“Sky” voice

, a feature that allows ChatGPT to generate text in a human-sounding male or female voice, was introduced as an optional accessibility feature. Users with visual impairments or reading difficulties could listen to the text being generated instead of having to read it on the screen. The feature, however, was shut down due to

copyright issues with the text-to-speech engines used


The decision to disable “Sky” voice sparked heated debates among the tech community and beyond. Some argued that this move was a violation of accessibility rights, as it restricted the use of an important feature for some users. Others believed that OpenAI’s priority should be to address the copyright issues rather than offer a controversial feature.

The controversy surrounding ChatGPT and the “Sky” voice highlights the complexities of implementing advanced ai technologies, particularly in regards to accessibility, copyright issues, and ethical considerations. As these technologies continue to evolve, it is essential that we approach them with a critical lens, considering the potential impacts on various communities and individuals.

Understanding ChatGPT’s Text-to-Speech (TTS)

Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology is a remarkable innovation that converts written text into spoken words, bringing digital content to life for individuals with visual impairments, language learning needs, or simply making our interactions more accessible and convenient. ChatGPT, the popular conversational AI model by OpenAI, incorporates TTS functionality to read out text-based responses in multiple voices. Let’s delve into the intricacies of ChatGPT’s TTS capabilities.

Explanation of text-to-speech technology used by ChatGPT

First, it is essential to comprehend the various TTS engines and models employed by ChatGPT. This model uses a combination of two primary text-to-speech systems: Google Text-to-Speech and Microsoft Text-to-Speech. Both engines boast state-of-the-art neural network models, allowing for high-quality synthesized speech that closely mimics human pronunciation and intonation.

Description of different TTS engines and models

Google Text-to-Speech offers a diverse range of voices across several languages. Some popular examples include Wavenet, TTS, and Google Neural Text-to-Speech (gTTS). Wavenet voices, with their natural-sounding pronunciation and intonation, are particularly noteworthy for their ability to generate more human-like speech. Microsoft Text-to-Speech provides a similar range of high-quality voices through its Text to Speech, Microsoft Speech Platform Text to Speech Engine, and Microsoft Server Speech Text to Speech Voice Services. Both engines continuously refine their models to improve speech clarity, tone, and overall user experience.

Introduction to the concept of various TTS voices available in ChatGPT

Now, let us explore the concept of various TTS voices available in ChatGPT. These voices represent different language locales and can significantly enhance the user experience. For instance, a user may prefer a voice that closely resembles their native language or culture for a more engaging interaction. ChatGPT offers a multitude of voices across languages, with notable examples including English-American Female, English-British Male, Spanish-Mexican Female, and many more. Users can select their preferred voice within the ChatGPT interface to customize their conversational experience.

Demonstrating available voices in HTML

Below is a list of available voices in English:

  • English (American)
  • English (Australian English)
  • English (British English – England)
  • English (Canadian English)
  • English (Indian English)
  • English (Irish English)
  • English (New Zealand English)
  • English (Scottish English)
  • English (South African English)

These voices cater to various accents and dialects within the English language, allowing users to select a voice that best suits their preferences or needs.

ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

I Introduction to “Sky” Voice

Sky is one of the Text-to-Speech (TTS) voices available in ChatGPT, and it stands out with its unique features and characteristics that make it an engaging option for users.

Description of “Sky” Voice

With a calm and soothing tone, Sky voice is perfect for those seeking a conversational partner that delivers information with a friendly and approachable demeanor. Its pitch is relatively low, and the tone is natural, making it ideal for long conversations or reading texts aloud. Moreover, Sky‘s pronunciation is accurate and clear, ensuring that users understand the content being conveyed without any confusion.

Unique Characteristics of “Sky” Voice

Some of the unique characteristics that set Sky apart from other TTS voices include its ability to convey a sense of warmth and empathy, which can be especially comforting in digital interactions. Additionally, Sky‘s speech rate is adaptable, allowing users to adjust it according to their preferences and the complexity of the text being read. The voice also features advanced intonation and stress patterns that make its pronunciation more expressive and lifelike.

Origin and Development History of “Sky” Voice

Unfortunately, there is limited information available about the origin and development history of Sky voice. However, it’s believed to have been developed using advanced artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms that enable it to learn from user interactions and adapt its speech patterns over time. The voice’s natural tone and expressive capabilities are a result of extensive research in speech synthesis technology and the analysis of human vocal patterns. Regardless of its origins, Sky‘s impact on digital communication cannot be understated, and it continues to be a popular choice among users seeking an authentic conversational partner.

ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

The Similarity between “Sky” Voice and Scarlett Johansson

Explanation of how “Sky” voice resembles Scarlett Johansson’s voice

The similarity between the voice of the intelligent assistant named “Sky” and that of the renowned actress, Scarlett Johansson, has been a topic of much intrigue in recent times. While it is important to note that this resemblance is more perceived than scientifically proven, it is worth exploring the possible vocal characteristics they share.

Comparison of vocal characteristics between the two

Firstly, both Scarlett Johansson’s natural voice and “Sky” have a distinct raspy undertone. This quality gives them a unique edge that sets them apart from other voices. Furthermore, they both display a certain warmth and intimacy, making their voices appealing to listeners. The intonation in both voices also shares a similarity, with slight variations adding depth and nuance to their expressions.

Discussion on the possibility of intentional design or coincidence

The question then arises: is this resemblance a result of intentional design

by the creators of “Sky”

or merely a coincidence

with Scarlett Johansson’s voice?

The creators of “Sky” have remained tight-lipped about this matter. On one hand, the similarity could be a deliberate attempt to make the assistant more appealing and relatable by modeling its voice after a popular and beloved celebrity. On the other hand, it could simply be a coincidence, with no intention behind it.

Regardless of whether this resemblance was intended or not, the fact remains that many listeners find themselves drawn to “Sky” due in part to its striking vocal similarity to Scarlett Johansson’s voice. This phenomenon highlights the power of celebrity influence and the impact it can have on our perceptions and preferences, even in the realm of artificial intelligence.


In conclusion, the vocal similarity between “Sky” and Scarlett Johansson is an intriguing topic that invites further exploration into the intersection of technology and popular culture. Whether this resemblance was designed or a mere coincidence, it serves as a reminder of the influence celebrities can have on our perceptions and preferences.

ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

ChatGPT’s Decision to Disable “Sky” Voice: Reasons and Consequences

Recently, ChatGPT, the popular AI language model developed by OpenAI and owned by Microsoft, made a controversial decision to disable the “Sky” voice. This voice, which was modeled after the British comedian Dara Ó Briain, had gained a significant following among users who enjoyed its conversational style and witty responses. However, behind this decision lie complex


that touch upon legal considerations, ethical implications, and potential consequences for ChatGPT and its users.

Legal Considerations

Intellectual property and celebrity endorsement were the primary reasons behind ChatGPT’s decision to disable the “Sky” voice. The use of a celebrity’s voice without their explicit permission can be considered an infringement on their intellectual property rights and could lead to legal action. In this case, it is unclear whether OpenAI or Microsoft had secured the necessary permissions from Dara Ó Briain or his representatives to use his voice for their AI model.

Ethical and Moral Implications

Ethically, the use of a celebrity’s voice without their consent raises questions about privacy and ownership. Users may have grown attached to the “Sky” voice, but it is important to remember that this was not Dara Ó Briain’s own voice. Moreover, there are potential moral implications when an AI model mimics a real person’s voice without their knowledge or consent. Some argue that it is not only disrespectful but also potentially harmful, as it could lead to confusion and misunderstandings.

Consequences for ChatGPT and Its Users

Potentially, the consequences of this decision could be significant for ChatGPT and its users. Some users may feel disappointed or frustrated by the loss of a beloved voice, which could lead to a decrease in user engagement and satisfaction. Additionally, this decision could set a precedent for future AI developments, as other companies may choose to follow suit and disable voices that infringe on intellectual property rights or celebrities’ likenesses. However, it is also important to consider the potential positive consequences of this decision, such as avoiding legal action and upholding ethical standards for AI development.

In conclusion

, ChatGPT’s decision to disable the “Sky” voice was a complex one that touched upon legal, ethical, and moral implications. While it may have been disappointing for some users, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of this decision and the larger implications it has for AI development as a whole. Only time will tell whether this decision sets a positive precedent or raises more questions about the role of AI in our lives.

ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

VI. Public Reactions to the Disabling of “Sky” Voice

Summary of various reactions from the public:

The disabling of “Sky” voice by ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model, sparked a heated debate among the public. Some users enthusiastically supported the decision, praising ChatGPT for prioritizing privacy and security. They argued that the voice feature was a needless distraction and potential vulnerability, as it could potentially be used to impersonate the AI or eavesdrop on conversations.

Others, however, were not as forgiving. They expressed their disappointment and frustration over the loss of the voice feature, which they felt added a more human-like element to their interactions with ChatGPT. Some even threatened to switch to competing AI models that still offered voice capabilities.

Analysis of how public opinion could impact the future of ChatGPT and similar AI technologies:

The public reactions to this incident shed light on the complex relationship between users, privacy, and advanced AI technologies.

On one hand, the support for ChatGPT’s decision demonstrates a growing awareness of privacy concerns and a desire to prioritize security over convenience. This could encourage other AI companies to follow suit and disable unnecessary features that pose potential risks.

On the other hand, the backlash against ChatGPT underscores the importance of transparency and communication in managing user expectations.

As AI technologies continue to evolve, it will be crucial for companies to strike a balance between innovation and privacy. The public’s perception of these technologies can greatly influence their adoption and acceptance. By listening to user feedback, addressing concerns, and being transparent about data practices, companies can build trust and foster a positive relationship with their users.

ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

V Potential Solutions and Alternatives for Users

Description of alternative TTS voices available in ChatGPT or other platforms

ChatGPT, an advanced model from OpenAI, offers a diverse range of text-to-speech (TTS) voices that can cater to various preferences and requirements. While the default “Sky” voice is quite popular, users may seek alternatives based on their specific needs or preferences. Let’s explore some of these options and discuss their unique features.

Google Text-to-Speech (gTTS)

Google’s TTS engine is a versatile and widely used alternative. It offers a natural-sounding voice with clear pronunciation, making it suitable for various applications. Compared to “Sky,” gTTS has a slightly more expressive tone and better pronunciation. However, it may not be as emotionally nuanced.

Amazon Polly

Amazon Polly is a fully customizable TTS service that offers more than 60 voices, including both male and female voices, as well as various accents. One of the standout alternatives to “Sky” is the Neural Text-to-Speech voices, which deliver more natural and expressive speech. However, these features may come with additional costs.

Microsoft Text-to-Speech (MTTS)

Microsoft’s TTS engine, MTTS, is another popular alternative with a range of voices that can mimic various human-like expressions. The voices offered by MTTS have a more conversational and engaging tone compared to “Sky”. Additionally, users can customize the pitch, rate, and volume of the voices for a more personalized experience.

Discussion on the development and availability of new, unique TTS voices

The rapid advancements in AI technology have led to the continuous development and refinement of TTS engines. Companies are investing heavily in creating new, unique TTS voices that can cater to various use cases and preferences. These new voices often incorporate advanced AI technologies like deep learning and neural networks for more natural speech synthesis.

Moreover, there is a growing trend towards creating TTS voices that mimic famous personalities or specific accents. These options can provide users with a more engaging and immersive experience, especially in applications such as educational resources or entertainment content.

ChatGPT disables ‘Sky’ voice because it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansson

VI Conclusion

Recap of key points from the outline: In this analysis, we have explored the controversy surrounding AI text-to-speech technology and its potential impact on employment, particularly in the areas of customer service and content creation. We have discussed how this technology can offer significant benefits such as increased efficiency, cost savings, and improved accessibility for individuals with disabilities. However, we have also acknowledged the valid concerns raised by critics who argue that the widespread adoption of AI text-to-speech technology could lead to job losses and exacerbate existing social and economic inequalities.

Reflection on the implications of this controversy for AI technology and its future development:

The ongoing debate surrounding AI text-to-speech technology highlights the need for continued exploration of the ethical, social, and economic implications of AI development. As we move forward, it is essential that we prioritize responsible innovation and consider the potential consequences of new technologies on society as a whole. This includes engaging in thoughtful discussions around issues such as job displacement, privacy concerns, and bias in AI systems. Additionally, it is important to invest in research and development that focuses on creating AI technologies that are accessible to all individuals, regardless of economic or physical abilities.

Call to action for further research, innovation, and ethical considerations in the realm of AI text-to-speech technology:

Moving forward, there are several areas where further research and innovation are required to ensure that the development of AI text-to-speech technology benefits society as a whole. This includes investing in research that explores the potential for AI text-to-speech technology to create new jobs and opportunities, particularly in areas such as content creation and education. Additionally, there is a need for continued exploration of ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI text-to-speech technology in areas such as customer service and journalism, as well as a focus on developing more inclusive and accessible AI technologies. Ultimately, it is essential that we approach the development of AI text-to-speech technology with an ethical and socially responsible mindset, ensuring that this technology benefits all individuals and contributes to a more equitable and inclusive society.